Head-to-Head Analysis

Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites vs Original flavors

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites

Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original flavors

Original flavors

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
450 kcal
Energy
388.9 kcal
41.7g
Sugars
61.1g
15g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites and Original flavors side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites is the more energy-dense option here, packing 61 more calories per 100g than Original flavors. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites takes the lead with only 41.7g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original flavors contains 61.11g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Original flavors in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites or Original flavors?

It depends on your goals. Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites has 450 calories, while Original flavors has 388.89 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites vegan?

No, Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Crunchy Hazelnut & Cocoa filled Cereal Bites and Original flavors?

There is a difference of 61 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.