Head-to-Head Analysis

Crunchy Ramen Snack Original vs Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Crunchy Ramen Snack Original

Crunchy Ramen Snack Original

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size

Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
438 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
39.6g
21.4g
Fat
12.5g
7.1g
Protein
4.2g
2.6g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Crunchy Ramen Snack Original and Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Crunchy Ramen Snack Original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 62 more calories per 100g than Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Crunchy Ramen Snack Original takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size contains 39.6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Crunchy Ramen Snack Original offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Crunchy Ramen Snack Original or Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size?

It depends on your goals. Crunchy Ramen Snack Original has 500 calories, while Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size has 438 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Crunchy Ramen Snack Original vegan?

No, Crunchy Ramen Snack Original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Crunchy Ramen Snack Original and Barre Lucky Charms Treats King Size?

There is a difference of 62 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.