Head-to-Head Analysis

Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo vs Keebler Toast and Peanut Butter Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo

Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Keebler Toast and Peanut Butter Crackers

Keebler Toast and Peanut Butter Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
477 kcal
Energy
490 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
11.8g
23.3g
Fat
23.5g
43.3g
Protein
9.8g
1.2g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo and Keebler Toast and Peanut Butter Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo is the clear winner. With 13 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo takes the lead with only 6.67g of sugar per 100g, whereas Keebler Toast and Peanut Butter Crackers contains 11.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo offers a protein boost with 43.3g per 100g, outperforming Keebler Toast and Peanut Butter Crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo or Keebler Toast and Peanut Butter Crackers?

Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo vegan?

No, Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Crunchy roasted edamame beans buffalo and Keebler Toast and Peanut Butter Crackers?

There is a difference of 13 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.