Head-to-Head Analysis

Crystal Candy vs Original cocorolls

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Crystal Candy

Crystal Candy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original cocorolls

Original cocorolls

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
464.3 kcal
57.1g
Sugars
28.6g
0g
Fat
17.9g
0g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Crystal Candy and Original cocorolls side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Crystal Candy is the clear winner. With 214 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Crystal Candy contains significantly more sugar (57.1g) compared to the milder Original cocorolls (28.571428571429g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original cocorolls is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Crystal Candy or Original cocorolls?

It depends on your goals. Crystal Candy has 250 calories, while Original cocorolls has 464.28571428571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Crystal Candy vegan?

No, Crystal Candy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Crystal Candy and Original cocorolls?

There is a difference of 214 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.