Head-to-Head Analysis

CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP vs Organic Lime Squeeze

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP

CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Lime Squeeze

Organic Lime Squeeze

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
117 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
0g
6.7g
Fat
0g
3.3g
Protein
0g
1.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP and Organic Lime Squeeze side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP is the more energy-dense option here, packing 117 more calories per 100g than Organic Lime Squeeze. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP contains significantly more sugar (6.67g) compared to the milder Organic Lime Squeeze (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Lime Squeeze is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Organic Lime Squeeze in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP or Organic Lime Squeeze?

It depends on your goals. CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP has 117 calories, while Organic Lime Squeeze has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP vegan?

No, CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between CUCUMBER RANCH YOGURT DRESSING & DIP and Organic Lime Squeeze?

There is a difference of 117 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.