Head-to-Head Analysis

Culantro Cooking Base vs Evaporated Filled Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Culantro Cooking Base

Culantro Cooking Base

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Evaporated Filled Milk

Evaporated Filled Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
422 kcal
0g
Sugars
33.3g
0g
Fat
22.2g
0g
Protein
22.2g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Culantro Cooking Base and Evaporated Filled Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Culantro Cooking Base is the clear winner. With 422 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Culantro Cooking Base takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Evaporated Filled Milk contains 33.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Culantro Cooking Base or Evaporated Filled Milk?

Culantro Cooking Base appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Culantro Cooking Base vegan?

No, Culantro Cooking Base is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Culantro Cooking Base and Evaporated Filled Milk?

There is a difference of 422 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.