Head-to-Head Analysis

Czekolada mocno gorzka 80% vs Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Czekolada mocno gorzka 80%

Czekolada mocno gorzka 80%

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips

Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
558 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
16g
Sugars
0g
45g
Fat
25g
10g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Czekolada mocno gorzka 80% and Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Czekolada mocno gorzka 80% is the more energy-dense option here, packing 58 more calories per 100g than Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Czekolada mocno gorzka 80% contains significantly more sugar (16g) compared to the milder Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Czekolada mocno gorzka 80% offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Czekolada mocno gorzka 80% or Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips?

It depends on your goals. Czekolada mocno gorzka 80% has 558 calories, while Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Czekolada mocno gorzka 80% vegan?

No, Czekolada mocno gorzka 80% is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Czekolada mocno gorzka 80% and Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips?

There is a difference of 58 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.