Head-to-Head Analysis

Dail Bar vs Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dail Bar

Dail Bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original

Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
382 kcal
Energy
250 kcal
11.8g
Sugars
0g
14.7g
Fat
0g
29.4g
Protein
0g
0.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dail Bar and Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dail Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 132 more calories per 100g than Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dail Bar contains significantly more sugar (11.8g) compared to the milder Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dail Bar offers a protein boost with 29.4g per 100g, outperforming Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dail Bar or Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original?

It depends on your goals. Dail Bar has 382 calories, while Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original has 250 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dail Bar vegan?

No, Dail Bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dail Bar and Juicy fruit, fruity chews sugarfree gum, original?

There is a difference of 132 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.