Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate vs Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate

Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry

Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
550 kcal
Energy
5 kcal
47.5g
Sugars
0g
32.5g
Fat
0g
5g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate and Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 545 more calories per 100g than Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (47.5g) compared to the milder Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dark Chocolate offers a protein boost with 5g per 100g, outperforming Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate or Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate has 550 calories, while Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate and Wrigley's starburst sugarfree gum strawberry?

There is a difference of 545 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.