Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein vs Blueberry Waffles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein

Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Blueberry Waffles

Blueberry Waffles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
420 kcal
Energy
257 kcal
20g
Sugars
7.1g
16g
Fat
8.6g
16g
Protein
4.3g
0.4g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein and Blueberry Waffles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein is the more energy-dense option here, packing 163 more calories per 100g than Blueberry Waffles. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Blueberry Waffles (7.14g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Blueberry Waffles is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein offers a protein boost with 16g per 100g, outperforming Blueberry Waffles in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein or Blueberry Waffles?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein has 420 calories, while Blueberry Waffles has 257 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Cocoa Breakfast Protein and Blueberry Waffles?

There is a difference of 163 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.