Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds vs Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds

Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix

Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
533 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
16.7g
40g
Fat
0g
10g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
13.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds and Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 200 more calories per 100g than Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds contains significantly more sugar (33.3g) compared to the milder Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix (16.7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds or Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds has 533 calories, while Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix has 333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds and Chicken Flavored Gravy Mix?

There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.