Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds vs Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds

Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme

Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
535.7 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
35.7g
Sugars
0g
39.3g
Fat
0g
10.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds and Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 536 more calories per 100g than Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds contains significantly more sugar (35.714285714286g) compared to the milder Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds offers a protein boost with 10.714285714286g per 100g, outperforming Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds or Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds has 535.71428571429 calories, while Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds and Kisses Cookies 'n' Creme?

There is a difference of 536 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.