Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries vs Golden Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries

Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Golden Original

Golden Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
475 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
60g
Sugars
0g
22.5g
Fat
35.7g
2.5g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries and Golden Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries is the clear winner. With 61 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries contains significantly more sugar (60g) compared to the milder Golden Original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Golden Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries or Golden Original?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries has 475 calories, while Golden Original has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries and Golden Original?

There is a difference of 61 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.