Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries vs Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries
Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries and Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries is the clear winner. With 67 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries contains significantly more sugar (53.3g) compared to the milder Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries or Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips?
It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries has 433 calories, while Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries vegan?
No, Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Covered Blueberries and Canyon Cut Sea Salt Kettle Chips?
There is a difference of 67 calories per 100g between the two products.
