Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries vs Toaster pastries, frosted hot fudge sundae

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries

Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Toaster pastries, frosted hot fudge sundae

Toaster pastries, frosted hot fudge sundae

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
396 kcal
50g
Sugars
33.3g
23.3g
Fat
9.4g
3.3g
Protein
4.2g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries and Toaster pastries, frosted hot fudge sundae side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries is the more energy-dense option here, packing 37 more calories per 100g than Toaster pastries, frosted hot fudge sundae. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries contains significantly more sugar (50g) compared to the milder Toaster pastries, frosted hot fudge sundae (33.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Toaster pastries, frosted hot fudge sundae is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries or Toaster pastries, frosted hot fudge sundae?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries has 433 calories, while Toaster pastries, frosted hot fudge sundae has 396 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Covered Cherries and Toaster pastries, frosted hot fudge sundae?

There is a difference of 37 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.