Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds vs Salted 313 urban chips
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds
Salted 313 urban chips
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds and Salted 313 urban chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 33 more calories per 100g than Salted 313 urban chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Salted 313 urban chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salted 313 urban chips is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Salted 313 urban chips in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds or Salted 313 urban chips?
It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds has 533 calories, while Salted 313 urban chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds vegan?
No, Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Covered Coconut Almonds and Salted 313 urban chips?
There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.
