Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate vs Golden Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate

Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Golden Original

Golden Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
233 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
20g
Sugars
0g
13.3g
Fat
35.7g
3.3g
Protein
7.1g
0g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate and Golden Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate is the clear winner. With 303 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Golden Original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Golden Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate or Golden Original?

It depends on your goals. Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate has 233 calories, while Golden Original has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate vegan?

No, Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark chocolate covered pineapple tidbits, dark chocolate and Golden Original?

There is a difference of 303 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.