Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate Nut Trio vs Original White Chocolate Style Bar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate Nut Trio

Dark Chocolate Nut Trio

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original White Chocolate Style Bar

Original White Chocolate Style Bar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
607 kcal
Energy
448 kcal
17.9g
Sugars
6.9g
50g
Fat
34.5g
14.3g
Protein
6.9g
0.3g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate Nut Trio and Original White Chocolate Style Bar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Chocolate Nut Trio is the more energy-dense option here, packing 159 more calories per 100g than Original White Chocolate Style Bar. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Nut Trio contains significantly more sugar (17.9g) compared to the milder Original White Chocolate Style Bar (6.9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original White Chocolate Style Bar is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dark Chocolate Nut Trio offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Original White Chocolate Style Bar in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Nut Trio or Original White Chocolate Style Bar?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Nut Trio has 607 calories, while Original White Chocolate Style Bar has 448 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate Nut Trio vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate Nut Trio is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Nut Trio and Original White Chocolate Style Bar?

There is a difference of 159 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.