Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters vs Chicken Curry Empanadas

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters

Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken Curry Empanadas

Chicken Curry Empanadas

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
405.4 kcal
Energy
235 kcal
59.5g
Sugars
0g
12.2g
Fat
10.3g
2.7g
Protein
8.8g
2.4g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters and Chicken Curry Empanadas side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters is the more energy-dense option here, packing 170 more calories per 100g than Chicken Curry Empanadas. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters contains significantly more sugar (59.459459459459g) compared to the milder Chicken Curry Empanadas (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken Curry Empanadas is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters or Chicken Curry Empanadas?

It depends on your goals. Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters has 405.40540540541 calories, while Chicken Curry Empanadas has 235 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters vegan?

No, Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark chocolate sea salt caramel corn clusters and Chicken Curry Empanadas?

There is a difference of 170 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.