Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight vs Lily's dark chocolate covered almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight

Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lily's dark chocolate covered almonds

Lily's dark chocolate covered almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
381 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
14.3g
Sugars
3.6g
9.5g
Fat
42.9g
15.9g
Protein
14.3g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight and Lily's dark chocolate covered almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight is the clear winner. With 119 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight contains significantly more sugar (14.3g) compared to the milder Lily's dark chocolate covered almonds (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lily's dark chocolate covered almonds is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight or Lily's dark chocolate covered almonds?

It depends on your goals. Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight has 381 calories, while Lily's dark chocolate covered almonds has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight vegan?

No, Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Chocolate Sea Salt Oats Overnight and Lily's dark chocolate covered almonds?

There is a difference of 119 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.