Dark chocolate with chocolate filling vs Sugar free star brites peppermints hard candy
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Dark chocolate with chocolate filling

Sugar free star brites peppermints hard candy
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Dark chocolate with chocolate filling and Sugar free star brites peppermints hard candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Dark chocolate with chocolate filling is the more energy-dense option here, packing 324 more calories per 100g than Sugar free star brites peppermints hard candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark chocolate with chocolate filling contains significantly more sugar (14.9g) compared to the milder Sugar free star brites peppermints hard candy (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sugar free star brites peppermints hard candy is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Dark chocolate with chocolate filling offers a protein boost with 4.26g per 100g, outperforming Sugar free star brites peppermints hard candy in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Dark chocolate with chocolate filling or Sugar free star brites peppermints hard candy?
It depends on your goals. Dark chocolate with chocolate filling has 511 calories, while Sugar free star brites peppermints hard candy has 187.5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Dark chocolate with chocolate filling vegan?
No, Dark chocolate with chocolate filling is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Dark chocolate with chocolate filling and Sugar free star brites peppermints hard candy?
There is a difference of 324 calories per 100g between the two products.




