Head-to-Head Analysis

Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars vs Sour blast buddies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars

Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sour blast buddies

Sour blast buddies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
600 kcal
Energy
266.7 kcal
40g
Sugars
6.7g
36g
Fat
0g
8g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars and Sour blast buddies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars is the more energy-dense option here, packing 333 more calories per 100g than Sour blast buddies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Sour blast buddies (6.6666666666667g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sour blast buddies is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars offers a protein boost with 8g per 100g, outperforming Sour blast buddies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars or Sour blast buddies?

It depends on your goals. Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars has 600 calories, while Sour blast buddies has 266.66666666667 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars vegan?

No, Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dark Roasted Hazelnut Chocolate Bars and Sour blast buddies?

There is a difference of 333 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.