Head-to-Head Analysis

David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo vs Wild blueberries

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo

David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild blueberries

Wild blueberries

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
633.3 kcal
Energy
57.1 kcal
0g
Sugars
7.1g
53.3g
Fat
0g
23.3g
Protein
0g
20.4g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo and Wild blueberries side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo is the more energy-dense option here, packing 576 more calories per 100g than Wild blueberries. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wild blueberries contains 7.14g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo offers a protein boost with 23.333333333333g per 100g, outperforming Wild blueberries in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo or Wild blueberries?

It depends on your goals. David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo has 633.33333333333 calories, while Wild blueberries has 57.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo vegan?

No, David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between David roasted and salted cracked pepper jumbo and Wild blueberries?

There is a difference of 576 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.