Head-to-Head Analysis

Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge vs Planters Salted Peanuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge

Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Planters Salted Peanuts

Planters Salted Peanuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
423 kcal
Energy
600 kcal
40.4g
Sugars
4.3g
17.3g
Fat
51.4g
5.8g
Protein
27.1g
0.6g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge and Planters Salted Peanuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge is the clear winner. With 177 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge contains significantly more sugar (40.4g) compared to the milder Planters Salted Peanuts (4.29g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Planters Salted Peanuts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge or Planters Salted Peanuts?

It depends on your goals. Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge has 423 calories, while Planters Salted Peanuts has 600 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge vegan?

No, Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Decadent Chocolate Chunk - Triple Chocolate Fudge and Planters Salted Peanuts?

There is a difference of 177 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.