Head-to-Head Analysis

Desert vs Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Desert

Desert

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds

Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
514 kcal
0g
Sugars
31.4g
0g
Fat
37.1g
0g
Protein
11.4g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Desert and Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Desert is the clear winner. With 514 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Desert takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds contains 31.4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Desert or Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds?

Desert appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Desert vegan?

No, Desert is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Desert and Dark Chocolate Covered Almonds?

There is a difference of 514 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.