Head-to-Head Analysis

Desert Palm Pitted Dates vs the ORIGINAL 45% VEGETABLE OIL SPREAD

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Desert Palm Pitted Dates

Desert Palm Pitted Dates

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of the ORIGINAL 45% VEGETABLE OIL SPREAD

the ORIGINAL 45% VEGETABLE OIL SPREAD

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
300 kcal
Energy
428.6 kcal
67.5g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
42.9g
2.5g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Desert Palm Pitted Dates and the ORIGINAL 45% VEGETABLE OIL SPREAD side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Desert Palm Pitted Dates is the clear winner. With 129 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Desert Palm Pitted Dates contains significantly more sugar (67.5g) compared to the milder the ORIGINAL 45% VEGETABLE OIL SPREAD (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, the ORIGINAL 45% VEGETABLE OIL SPREAD is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Desert Palm Pitted Dates offers a protein boost with 2.5g per 100g, outperforming the ORIGINAL 45% VEGETABLE OIL SPREAD in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Desert Palm Pitted Dates or the ORIGINAL 45% VEGETABLE OIL SPREAD?

It depends on your goals. Desert Palm Pitted Dates has 300 calories, while the ORIGINAL 45% VEGETABLE OIL SPREAD has 428.57142857143 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Desert Palm Pitted Dates vegan?

No, Desert Palm Pitted Dates is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Desert Palm Pitted Dates and the ORIGINAL 45% VEGETABLE OIL SPREAD?

There is a difference of 129 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.