Head-to-Head Analysis

DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch vs Thin Wheat Original crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch

DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Thin Wheat Original crackers

Thin Wheat Original crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
450 kcal
Energy
433 kcal
12.5g
Sugars
43g
20g
Fat
16.7g
25g
Protein
6.7g
0.7g
Salt
4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch and Thin Wheat Original crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch is the more energy-dense option here, packing 17 more calories per 100g than Thin Wheat Original crackers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch takes the lead with only 12.5g of sugar per 100g, whereas Thin Wheat Original crackers contains 43g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Thin Wheat Original crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch or Thin Wheat Original crackers?

It depends on your goals. DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch has 450 calories, while Thin Wheat Original crackers has 433 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch vegan?

No, DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between DETH Chocolate Almond Coconut Crunch and Thin Wheat Original crackers?

There is a difference of 17 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.