Head-to-Head Analysis

Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews vs Double dark chocolate chunk granola

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews

Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Double dark chocolate chunk granola

Double dark chocolate chunk granola

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571 kcal
Energy
423 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
23.1g
50g
Fat
13.5g
17.9g
Protein
11.5g
0g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews and Double dark chocolate chunk granola side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews is the more energy-dense option here, packing 148 more calories per 100g than Double dark chocolate chunk granola. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Double dark chocolate chunk granola contains 23.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming Double dark chocolate chunk granola in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews or Double dark chocolate chunk granola?

It depends on your goals. Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews has 571 calories, while Double dark chocolate chunk granola has 423 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews vegan?

No, Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dexlue Whole Unsalted Cashews and Double dark chocolate chunk granola?

There is a difference of 148 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.