Dietz & Watson Gourmet Lite Cooked Ham vs Taralli Classico
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Dietz & Watson Gourmet Lite Cooked Ham
Taralli Classico
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Dietz & Watson Gourmet Lite Cooked Ham and Taralli Classico side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Dietz & Watson Gourmet Lite Cooked Ham is the clear winner. With 477 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Dietz & Watson Gourmet Lite Cooked Ham takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Taralli Classico contains 2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Dietz & Watson Gourmet Lite Cooked Ham or Taralli Classico?
Dietz & Watson Gourmet Lite Cooked Ham appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Dietz & Watson Gourmet Lite Cooked Ham vegan?
No, Dietz & Watson Gourmet Lite Cooked Ham is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Dietz & Watson Gourmet Lite Cooked Ham and Taralli Classico?
There is a difference of 477 calories per 100g between the two products.
