Head-to-Head Analysis

Digestives The Original Twin Pack vs Martin's value size butter flavored popcorn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Digestives The Original Twin Pack

Digestives The Original Twin Pack

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Martin's value size butter flavored popcorn

Martin's value size butter flavored popcorn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
483 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
15.1g
Sugars
0g
21.3g
Fat
32.1g
7g
Protein
7.1g
1.3g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Digestives The Original Twin Pack and Martin's value size butter flavored popcorn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Digestives The Original Twin Pack is the clear winner. With 53 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Digestives The Original Twin Pack contains significantly more sugar (15.1g) compared to the milder Martin's value size butter flavored popcorn (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Martin's value size butter flavored popcorn is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Digestives The Original Twin Pack or Martin's value size butter flavored popcorn?

It depends on your goals. Digestives The Original Twin Pack has 483 calories, while Martin's value size butter flavored popcorn has 535.71 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Digestives The Original Twin Pack vegan?

No, Digestives The Original Twin Pack is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Digestives The Original Twin Pack and Martin's value size butter flavored popcorn?

There is a difference of 53 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.