Head-to-Head Analysis

Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment vs Stone Ground Mustard

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment

Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Stone Ground Mustard

Stone Ground Mustard

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
667 kcal
Energy
5 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0g
60g
Fat
0g
13.3g
Protein
0g
4.4g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment and Stone Ground Mustard side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment is the more energy-dense option here, packing 662 more calories per 100g than Stone Ground Mustard. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Stone Ground Mustard (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Stone Ground Mustard is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment offers a protein boost with 13.33g per 100g, outperforming Stone Ground Mustard in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment or Stone Ground Mustard?

It depends on your goals. Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment has 667 calories, while Stone Ground Mustard has 5 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment vegan?

No, Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dona maria, pipian mexican condiment and Stone Ground Mustard?

There is a difference of 662 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.