Head-to-Head Analysis

Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars vs Caramel hard candies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars

Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Caramel hard candies

Caramel hard candies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
419 kcal
Energy
312 kcal
19.4g
Sugars
0g
14.5g
Fat
6.3g
6.5g
Protein
0g
0.4g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars and Caramel hard candies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars is the more energy-dense option here, packing 107 more calories per 100g than Caramel hard candies. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars contains significantly more sugar (19.4g) compared to the milder Caramel hard candies (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Caramel hard candies is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars offers a protein boost with 6.45g per 100g, outperforming Caramel hard candies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars or Caramel hard candies?

It depends on your goals. Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars has 419 calories, while Caramel hard candies has 312 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars vegan?

No, Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Double Chocolate Chewy Granola Bars and Caramel hard candies?

There is a difference of 107 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.