Head-to-Head Analysis

Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters vs Brads raw chip kale

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters

Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Brads raw chip kale

Brads raw chip kale

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
429 kcal
Energy
286 kcal
25g
Sugars
7.1g
14.3g
Fat
12.5g
10.7g
Protein
10.7g
0.5g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters and Brads raw chip kale side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters is the more energy-dense option here, packing 143 more calories per 100g than Brads raw chip kale. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters contains significantly more sugar (25g) compared to the milder Brads raw chip kale (7.1429g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Brads raw chip kale is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters or Brads raw chip kale?

It depends on your goals. Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters has 429 calories, while Brads raw chip kale has 286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters vegan?

No, Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Double Chocolate Espresso Granola Clusters and Brads raw chip kale?

There is a difference of 143 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.