Head-to-Head Analysis

Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie vs Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie

Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip

Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
424 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
35.4g
Sugars
42.9g
18.2g
Fat
21.4g
6.1g
Protein
3.6g
1.3g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie and Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie is the clear winner. With 76 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie takes the lead with only 35.4g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip contains 42.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie offers a protein boost with 6.06g per 100g, outperforming Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie or Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip?

Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie vegan?

No, Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Double Chocolate Hazelnut Cookie and Cookies, thin and crispy, milk chocolate chip?

There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.