Head-to-Head Analysis

Double Dark Chocolate Almonds vs Extra Mega Pack Sweet Watermelon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Double Dark Chocolate Almonds

Double Dark Chocolate Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Extra Mega Pack Sweet Watermelon

Extra Mega Pack Sweet Watermelon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
160 kcal
Energy
200 kcal
6g
Sugars
0g
13g
Fat
0g
5g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Double Dark Chocolate Almonds and Extra Mega Pack Sweet Watermelon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Double Dark Chocolate Almonds is the clear winner. With 40 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Double Dark Chocolate Almonds contains significantly more sugar (6g) compared to the milder Extra Mega Pack Sweet Watermelon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Extra Mega Pack Sweet Watermelon is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Double Dark Chocolate Almonds offers a protein boost with 5g per 100g, outperforming Extra Mega Pack Sweet Watermelon in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Double Dark Chocolate Almonds or Extra Mega Pack Sweet Watermelon?

It depends on your goals. Double Dark Chocolate Almonds has 160 calories, while Extra Mega Pack Sweet Watermelon has 200 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Double Dark Chocolate Almonds vegan?

No, Double Dark Chocolate Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Double Dark Chocolate Almonds and Extra Mega Pack Sweet Watermelon?

There is a difference of 40 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.