Head-to-Head Analysis

Double Feature Trail Mix vs garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Double Feature Trail Mix

Double Feature Trail Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch

garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
535 kcal
Energy
464.3 kcal
23.3g
Sugars
0g
39.5g
Fat
25g
14g
Protein
3.6g
0.3g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Double Feature Trail Mix and garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Double Feature Trail Mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 71 more calories per 100g than garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Double Feature Trail Mix contains significantly more sugar (23.3g) compared to the milder garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Double Feature Trail Mix offers a protein boost with 14g per 100g, outperforming garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Double Feature Trail Mix or garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch?

It depends on your goals. Double Feature Trail Mix has 535 calories, while garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch has 464.285714285714 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Double Feature Trail Mix vegan?

No, Double Feature Trail Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Double Feature Trail Mix and garden veggie Straws Zesty Ranch?

There is a difference of 71 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.