Head-to-Head Analysis

Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl vs Veggie Straws - Sea Salted

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl

Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Veggie Straws - Sea Salted

Veggie Straws - Sea Salted

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
113 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
6.2g
Sugars
0g
1.9g
Fat
21.4g
7.9g
Protein
3.6g
1.1g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl and Veggie Straws - Sea Salted side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl is the clear winner. With 351 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl contains significantly more sugar (6.18g) compared to the milder Veggie Straws - Sea Salted (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Veggie Straws - Sea Salted is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl offers a protein boost with 7.94g per 100g, outperforming Veggie Straws - Sea Salted in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl or Veggie Straws - Sea Salted?

It depends on your goals. Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl has 113 calories, while Veggie Straws - Sea Salted has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl vegan?

No, Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Double Yakitori Chicken Rice Bowl and Veggie Straws - Sea Salted?

There is a difference of 351 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.