Head-to-Head Analysis

Dr. Thunder vs Silk Oatmilk creamy lowfat

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dr. Thunder

Dr. Thunder

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Silk Oatmilk creamy lowfat

Silk Oatmilk creamy lowfat

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
42 kcal
Energy
25 kcal
11.6g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
1.3g
0g
Protein
0.4g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dr. Thunder and Silk Oatmilk creamy lowfat side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dr. Thunder is the more energy-dense option here, packing 17 more calories per 100g than Silk Oatmilk creamy lowfat. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dr. Thunder contains significantly more sugar (11.55g) compared to the milder Silk Oatmilk creamy lowfat (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Silk Oatmilk creamy lowfat is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dr. Thunder or Silk Oatmilk creamy lowfat?

It depends on your goals. Dr. Thunder has 42 calories, while Silk Oatmilk creamy lowfat has 25 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dr. Thunder vegan?

No, Dr. Thunder is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dr. Thunder and Silk Oatmilk creamy lowfat?

There is a difference of 17 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.