Head-to-Head Analysis

Dr. Thunder vs Kombucha

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dr. Thunder

Dr. Thunder

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kombucha

Kombucha

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
41.7 kcal
Energy
8.5 kcal
11.4g
Sugars
2g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dr. Thunder and Kombucha side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dr. Thunder is the more energy-dense option here, packing 33 more calories per 100g than Kombucha. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dr. Thunder contains significantly more sugar (11.39g) compared to the milder Kombucha (1.9718309859155g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kombucha is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dr. Thunder or Kombucha?

It depends on your goals. Dr. Thunder has 41.67 calories, while Kombucha has 8.4507042253521 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dr. Thunder vegan?

No, Dr. Thunder is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dr. Thunder and Kombucha?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.