Head-to-Head Analysis

Dried California Prunes Pitted vs 100% orange juice from concentrate, orange

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dried California Prunes Pitted

Dried California Prunes Pitted

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of 100% orange juice from concentrate, orange

100% orange juice from concentrate, orange

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
244 kcal
Energy
46 kcal
37.8g
Sugars
9.2g
0g
Fat
0g
2.2g
Protein
0.8g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dried California Prunes Pitted and 100% orange juice from concentrate, orange side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dried California Prunes Pitted is the more energy-dense option here, packing 198 more calories per 100g than 100% orange juice from concentrate, orange. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dried California Prunes Pitted contains significantly more sugar (37.78g) compared to the milder 100% orange juice from concentrate, orange (9.17g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, 100% orange juice from concentrate, orange is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dried California Prunes Pitted or 100% orange juice from concentrate, orange?

It depends on your goals. Dried California Prunes Pitted has 244 calories, while 100% orange juice from concentrate, orange has 46 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dried California Prunes Pitted vegan?

No, Dried California Prunes Pitted is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dried California Prunes Pitted and 100% orange juice from concentrate, orange?

There is a difference of 198 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.