Head-to-Head Analysis

Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds vs Robust Italian Chicken Sausage

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds

Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Robust Italian Chicken Sausage

Robust Italian Chicken Sausage

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
450 kcal
Energy
179 kcal
40g
Sugars
0g
20g
Fat
10.7g
10g
Protein
17.9g
0g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds and Robust Italian Chicken Sausage side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 271 more calories per 100g than Robust Italian Chicken Sausage. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Robust Italian Chicken Sausage (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Robust Italian Chicken Sausage is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds or Robust Italian Chicken Sausage?

It depends on your goals. Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds has 450 calories, while Robust Italian Chicken Sausage has 179 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds vegan?

No, Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dried Cranberries & Toasted Sliced Almonds and Robust Italian Chicken Sausage?

There is a difference of 271 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.