Head-to-Head Analysis

Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt vs Dried Cranberries

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt

Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dried Cranberries

Dried Cranberries

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
714.3 kcal
Energy
350 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
70g
75g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt and Dried Cranberries side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 364 more calories per 100g than Dried Cranberries. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt takes the lead with only 3.5714285714286g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dried Cranberries contains 70g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt offers a protein boost with 7.1428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Dried Cranberries in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt or Dried Cranberries?

It depends on your goals. Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt has 714.28571428571 calories, while Dried Cranberries has 350 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt vegan?

No, Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dry Roasted Macadamias - Hawaiian Sea Salt and Dried Cranberries?

There is a difference of 364 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.