Head-to-Head Analysis

Dubai Cones vs Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Dubai Cones

Dubai Cones

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty

Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
40g
Sugars
0g
17.5g
Fat
32.1g
5g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Dubai Cones and Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Dubai Cones is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Dubai Cones contains significantly more sugar (40g) compared to the milder Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Dubai Cones offers a protein boost with 5g per 100g, outperforming Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Dubai Cones or Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty?

It depends on your goals. Dubai Cones has 500 calories, while Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Dubai Cones vegan?

No, Dubai Cones is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Dubai Cones and Organic plantain chips himalayan pink salt ounce salty?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.