Head-to-Head Analysis

Duchess Lifht Tuna in Water vs Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Duchess Lifht Tuna in Water

Duchess Lifht Tuna in Water

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon

Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107 kcal
Energy
141.2 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
5.9g
23.2g
Protein
23.5g
0.9g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Duchess Lifht Tuna in Water and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Duchess Lifht Tuna in Water is the clear winner. With 34 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Duchess Lifht Tuna in Water or Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon?

It depends on your goals. Duchess Lifht Tuna in Water has 107 calories, while Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 141.176470588235 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Duchess Lifht Tuna in Water vegan?

No, Duchess Lifht Tuna in Water is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Duchess Lifht Tuna in Water and Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon?

There is a difference of 34 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.