Head-to-Head Analysis

Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond vs Natural Super Chunk Peanut Butter Spread

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond

Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Natural Super Chunk Peanut Butter Spread

Natural Super Chunk Peanut Butter Spread

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
417 kcal
Energy
594 kcal
13.3g
Sugars
9.4g
13.3g
Fat
53.1g
13.3g
Protein
21.9g
0g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond and Natural Super Chunk Peanut Butter Spread side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond is the clear winner. With 177 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond contains significantly more sugar (13.3g) compared to the milder Natural Super Chunk Peanut Butter Spread (9.38g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Natural Super Chunk Peanut Butter Spread is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond or Natural Super Chunk Peanut Butter Spread?

It depends on your goals. Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond has 417 calories, while Natural Super Chunk Peanut Butter Spread has 594 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond vegan?

No, Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Early Riser Mix Dark Chocolate Almond and Natural Super Chunk Peanut Butter Spread?

There is a difference of 177 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.