Head-to-Head Analysis

Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough vs Rich & sweet pitted dates

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough

Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Rich & sweet pitted dates

Rich & sweet pitted dates

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
411.8 kcal
Energy
282 kcal
36.5g
Sugars
63.5g
16.5g
Fat
0g
4.7g
Protein
2.4g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough and Rich & sweet pitted dates side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough is the more energy-dense option here, packing 130 more calories per 100g than Rich & sweet pitted dates. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough takes the lead with only 36.470588235294g of sugar per 100g, whereas Rich & sweet pitted dates contains 63.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough offers a protein boost with 4.7058823529412g per 100g, outperforming Rich & sweet pitted dates in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough or Rich & sweet pitted dates?

It depends on your goals. Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough has 411.76470588235 calories, while Rich & sweet pitted dates has 282 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough vegan?

No, Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Edible Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough and Rich & sweet pitted dates?

There is a difference of 130 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.