Head-to-Head Analysis

Elbows Macaroni Pasta vs Cascadian Farm Organic Raspberry Fruit Spread

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Elbows Macaroni Pasta

Elbows Macaroni Pasta

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cascadian Farm Organic Raspberry Fruit Spread

Cascadian Farm Organic Raspberry Fruit Spread

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
357 kcal
Energy
237 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
52.6g
1.8g
Fat
0g
12.5g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Elbows Macaroni Pasta and Cascadian Farm Organic Raspberry Fruit Spread side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Elbows Macaroni Pasta is the more energy-dense option here, packing 120 more calories per 100g than Cascadian Farm Organic Raspberry Fruit Spread. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Elbows Macaroni Pasta takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cascadian Farm Organic Raspberry Fruit Spread contains 52.63g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Elbows Macaroni Pasta offers a protein boost with 12.5g per 100g, outperforming Cascadian Farm Organic Raspberry Fruit Spread in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Elbows Macaroni Pasta or Cascadian Farm Organic Raspberry Fruit Spread?

It depends on your goals. Elbows Macaroni Pasta has 357 calories, while Cascadian Farm Organic Raspberry Fruit Spread has 237 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Elbows Macaroni Pasta vegan?

No, Elbows Macaroni Pasta is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Elbows Macaroni Pasta and Cascadian Farm Organic Raspberry Fruit Spread?

There is a difference of 120 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.