Head-to-Head Analysis

Elderberry immune support vs Wonderful Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Elderberry immune support

Elderberry immune support

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Wonderful Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells

Wonderful Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1500 kcal
Energy
607.1 kcal
100g
Sugars
7.1g
0g
Fat
46.4g
0g
Protein
21.4g
0g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Elderberry immune support and Wonderful Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Elderberry immune support is the more energy-dense option here, packing 893 more calories per 100g than Wonderful Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Elderberry immune support contains significantly more sugar (100g) compared to the milder Wonderful Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells (7.1428571428571g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Wonderful Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Elderberry immune support or Wonderful Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells?

It depends on your goals. Elderberry immune support has 1500 calories, while Wonderful Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells has 607.14285714286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Elderberry immune support vegan?

No, Elderberry immune support is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Elderberry immune support and Wonderful Pistachios Chili Roasted No Shells?

There is a difference of 893 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.