Head-to-Head Analysis

Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts vs Sea Salt White Bean Tortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts

Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea Salt White Bean Tortilla Chips

Sea Salt White Bean Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
632.9 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
6.3g
Sugars
3.6g
57g
Fat
25g
19g
Protein
17.9g
0g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts and Sea Salt White Bean Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 169 more calories per 100g than Sea Salt White Bean Tortilla Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts contains significantly more sugar (6.3291139240506g) compared to the milder Sea Salt White Bean Tortilla Chips (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea Salt White Bean Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts or Sea Salt White Bean Tortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts has 632.91139240506 calories, while Sea Salt White Bean Tortilla Chips has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts vegan?

No, Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Emerald Natural Almonds and Walnuts and Sea Salt White Bean Tortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 169 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.