emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries vs Raw Almonds
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries
Raw Almonds
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries and Raw Almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries is the clear winner. With 401 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries contains significantly more sugar (22g) compared to the milder Raw Almonds (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Raw Almonds is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries or Raw Almonds?
It depends on your goals. emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries has 170 calories, while Raw Almonds has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries vegan?
No, emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries and Raw Almonds?
There is a difference of 401 calories per 100g between the two products.
